Peer Review Process
All submitted manuscripts to the Journal of AI-Driven Renewable Energy Systems (JADRES) undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of quality, originality, and relevance.
Upon submission, manuscripts are first evaluated by the editorial office to assess their suitability with respect to the journal’s scope, formatting requirements, and basic scientific quality. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without external review.
Submissions that pass the initial screening are assigned to expert reviewers in the relevant field.
Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. The identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.
Reviewers are requested to evaluate the manuscript based on the following criteria:
- Originality and contribution to the field
- Technical quality and correctness
- Clarity of presentation
- Relevance to the journal scope
Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editor makes one of the following decisions:
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
JADRES is committed to providing a fair, unbiased, and timely review process, typically completed within 4 to 6 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and the number of revision rounds.
